The case against the bank for only 51 rupees for three years, now the bank will give 9 thousand rupees

National Desk: Government office does not work. Private ones take arbitrarily the money. Bank service is not good. You have such complaints from the system but rarely have you taken action against these shortcomings. Saeed Hussaini, who lives in Bangalore, took action. He fought a bank for 3 years against a bank for just 51 rupees and finally won it. Case against SBI Bank ...

Rs. 9 thousand for the bank instead of Rs. 51

Syed Hussain, who lives in Bangalore, had a case against SBI in the Consumer Forum. He charged the poor service on the bank and cutting the Rs 51 without informing it. After which the court heard the judgment and ruled that Saeed should return the bank 51 rupees. The court ordered the bank to give Rs 5,000 for the trouble due to poor service and Rs 4 thousand spent in the case of the boy in the case of the boy.

Also read:

>>Israeli women's defense force are very beautiful & strongest defense force in the world.

>>SBI clerk recruitment 2018: SBI issues notification for over 9000 Clerk job opportunities; apply before 10 Feb

>>Who is the most educated person in India?

How was the cut to Rs 51

Saeed said that on 25th May 2015, his SBI account suddenly reduced to 51 rupees. When they asked the bank, it came to know that the bank sent a check book to Syed's home courier. But there was no one at home, so the courier went back to the person. In this courier person charged Rs 51. Which the bank cut from Saeed's account When Saeed heard this reason, he was surprised. Saeed said that he had not even opted to send the check book home. It was the receipt of his checkbook by visiting the bank. Then cutting the 51 rupees is wrong.

Apart from cutting 51 rupees, Saeed was more complaining than the bank. He informed that on September 23, 2014, he transferred 20 thousand rupees to the account of Twinkle Public School. But even after three days money was not available, the school people complained to Sayeed. Saeed asked the bank about this, the bankers said that the concerned employee was on leave. So money could not be transferred. Saeed also made a match to make the payment again. But there was no answer. After about eight days rupees were transferred. But the bank did not ask for any apology for this.

Saeed said that the poor service of the bank was going on. But the employees of the bank were not taking the name of improvement. So, they complained in the Consumer Forum. Whose decision came three years later and Sayeed won